As artificial intelligence becomes an increasingly common tool for researching products, evaluating brands, and making purchasing decisions, new research from Skyword reveals a widening trust gap between AI-generated information and brand messaging. The findings suggest that enterprise marketers must rethink how they build credibility as consumers increasingly rely on AI-powered discovery while seeking external validation before making decisions.
Based on a survey of 1,000 U.S. consumers, the study found that when AI-generated information conflicts with a brand's own messaging, most consumers turn to third-party sources rather than trusting either side outright. The results underscore the growing importance of authoritative content and brand visibility across channels that organizations do not fully control.
Only 29% of consumers trust a brand when AI-generated information conflicts with brand messaging.
Just 12% trust the AI-generated response outright.
More than half (54%) seek third-party validation before making a decision.
Forty-six percent of full-time employed Americans have made a major decision based primarily on AI-generated information.
Fifty-five percent cite inaccurate AI information as their top concern.
Thirty percent are less likely to engage with companies they believe rely on AI-generated content.
The research highlights a significant shift in how consumers evaluate information during the buying journey.
Historically, brands relied heavily on owned channels such as websites, product pages, and marketing materials to communicate value propositions and influence purchase decisions. Today, consumers increasingly encounter brand information through AI-powered platforms, analyst reports, publisher content, review sites, and third-party sources.
As a result, authority is no longer determined solely by a company's own messaging. Instead, consumers are validating claims across a broader ecosystem of information sources.
"AI search is often framed as a visibility issue, but the larger challenge is authority," said Andrew Wheeler, CEO of Skyword. "Consumers are using AI to make real decisions, but when the information feels incomplete or inconsistent, they are looking for proof beyond the brand's own claims. Companies need content that is credible, findable and strong enough to hold up wherever buyers encounter it."
While AI-assisted research is often associated with younger consumers, the survey points to broader adoption among professional and enterprise-focused audiences.
According to the findings, 46% of full-time employed Americans have already made a major purchase or important decision based primarily on AI-generated information. This trend is particularly relevant for B2B and enterprise marketers whose target audiences increasingly use AI tools during evaluation and research processes.
The research also found that AI adoption is strongest among higher-income and highly educated consumers. Households earning $100,000 or more annually are approximately 2.5 times more likely to begin their research with AI compared to households earning less than $50,000. Among consumers earning more than $200,000 annually, that gap increases even further.
Overall, 52% of consumers reported using AI more frequently than they did a year ago, while usage among Gen Z respondents reached 67%.
Despite rising adoption, confidence in AI-generated information remains limited.
When AI-generated content and brand messaging conflict:
54% of consumers seek external validation from other sources.
29% trust the brand's own information.
12% trust the AI-generated answer outright.
The findings suggest that neither brands nor AI platforms automatically command consumer trust. Instead, organizations must establish authority through consistent, accurate, and verifiable information that is reinforced across multiple channels.
Further highlighting consumer skepticism, 55% of respondents identified inaccurate AI-generated information as their primary concern when evaluating brand or product details.
The survey found that AI-generated information is already having a measurable impact on consumer behavior and purchasing decisions.
Among respondents:
47% have taken significant action based on AI-generated information.
17% have switched brands because of information provided by AI tools.
19% have avoided making a purchase due to AI-generated insights.
46% of full-time employed Americans have made major decisions based primarily on AI recommendations.
These findings indicate that AI is influencing not only research habits but also real-world purchasing behavior and brand perception.
"Brands cannot control every answer an AI tool generates, but they can control the quality, consistency and authority of the content that those tools and consumers can find," said Wheeler. "That makes authoritative content a business priority, not just a marketing asset."
The research also reveals growing skepticism toward AI-generated marketing content itself.
Thirty percent of consumers said they would be less likely to engage with or purchase from a company if they suspected its content was created by AI. In addition, 86% believe organizations should be required to disclose when content is AI-generated.
For enterprise marketers, these findings create a complex challenge. While AI adoption continues to rise among target audiences, consumers remain cautious about both AI-generated information and AI-generated content, increasing the importance of transparency and authenticity.
The study found that Gen Z remains one of the most active user groups for AI-powered research, with 67% reporting increased AI usage compared to 52% of respondents overall.
However, the findings suggest that higher usage does not necessarily translate into greater trust. Nearly one-third of Gen Z respondents reported contacting a brand to correct information generated by an AI tool, almost double the rate observed across the broader population.
This behavior reflects a growing expectation that information provided through AI systems should be accurate, transparent, and verifiable.
As AI-generated discovery becomes more influential, marketers are placing greater emphasis on understanding how their brands are represented within AI-generated responses.
To address this challenge, Skyword recently introduced the Category Authority Index™ (CAI), a metric available through its Accelerator360™ content marketing platform. The solution is designed to help organizations evaluate how AI systems cite, describe, and position their content within key industry and category discussions.
The findings suggest that as AI continues to reshape information discovery, building authority across owned, earned, and third-party channels will become increasingly critical for organizations seeking to influence purchasing decisions and maintain consumer trust.
The survey was conducted by Dynata in April 2026 and included 1,000 online responses from U.S. adults aged 18 and older.
Skyword is the enterprise content marketing agency with Accelerator360, a patented AI platform that transforms category expertise into audience preference and measurable pipeline growth. For over 15 years, brands like IBM, GE Healthcare, Mastercard, and ADP have relied on Skyword to plan, produce, and activate authoritative content at scale, with the governance and consistency complex enterprises require.
Where traditional agencies lack technology and AI-first platforms lack human depth, Skyword delivers both: AI-powered strategy and planning software, an expert-led global talent network, and integrated services built for the operational realities of large marketing organizations. The result is a content program that builds genuine category authority, attracts a higher-quality pipeline, and proves its impact on the business, not just the dashboard.
TechIntelPro empowers B2B technology decision-makers with the latest industry trends, deep insights, leadership perspectives and actionable intelligence to drive both organizational and professional milestones—and thrive on the tech pulse.